Jump to content

Mysterious Youth

Members
  • Content count

    334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Mysterious Youth last won the day on August 9

Mysterious Youth had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Mysterious Youth

  • Rank
    Registered User
  1. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    You claim to have tried some living card games and didn't like them. That's perfectly fine. However when you say it's a "challenge" to get the good cards, there's no challenge to it. Pulling Spheres is not skill-based. If you have money to buy them or get lucky, you will have them. If you're going to go after playsets and the best cards anyway, why waste all that time, money, and effort except that you seem to like wasting time, money, and effort? You must be a huge fan of freemium games and downloadable content then. It's not a matter of people wanting things handed to them. If anything, your comment about the serious crowd makes them seem to be the entitled ones holding up a "no commoners allowed" sign. I'm not a serious player if I don't have the money? Why is that a good thing? You really believe this business model is the best way to make money and attract new players? Should Monopoly adopt the card game business model and break it up into randomized packs too? "Man, that guy has way more get out of jail free cards than I do. And my iron token doesn't stand a chance against his shoe." The cards in a living card game don't magically fuse into a meta deck. You still have to put in the work, research, and playtesting to build the decks and master them. Do you think that living card game boxes have the cards pre-sorted into the best decks or something? Where do you think the challenge in chess comes from? You don't have a sideboard or anything. The pieces you see are the pieces you get. It ALWAYS comes down to you and your skill.
  2. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    I don't disagree with that, but he's saying if you want to hang with the "big boys", you better be prepared to shell out a lot of cash to fund an abusive business model. It's a privilege reserved for those with the proper finances. Something these companies could rectify to gain more customers, but refuse to because people still pay into it as is and that's okay. It's why I'm interested in how the Super card game will fare in a few years if it lasts that long. While some super rares are clearly more desirable than others, the small amount of them and most generous pull rate are pluses that I hope they continue with. Will the interest and supposed increase in players who get into the game but buy less product because they don't need it outweigh the usual suspects who indiscriminately buy boxes and not finish playsets? Find out next year on Dragon Ball Super!
  3. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    The problem isn't that trading/collectible card games require investment. It's the business model of most card games that are awful. Living card games require investment too, but at a far more reasonable price. What others are saying is that living card games kind of prove that this hobby doesn't have to cost as much as most card games do. You seem to imply that competitive living card game players aren't a "serious crowd". They spend money just like any card gamer and can be just as competitive as people from Magic or Yu-Gi-Oh!. They just didn't have to break the bank to do it. If I need to spend copious amounts of money to join the "serious crowd" of Magic and Yu-Gi-Oh! as their corporate suits dictate, cheaper options start to seem more attractive. Your "different thrill" comes from something independent of the games themselves. There's nothing inherently different between a living card game and a trading/collectible one except cost. They're all card games first and foremost. You seem to be arguing from a standpoint that has nothing to do with gameplay or quality. It's clear you simply have a different mindset and have enough money to take a loss on packs with garbage rares in exchange for one or two packs with high end cards.
  4. First shot at Beerus

    You can say the same about Bulma. Both her and Buu's purpose is to give you a free card, then sit there until you need to combo as one would rarely ever attack/KO them on purpose unless they were innocent bystanders from a Goten, Family of Justice with no other targets. They also help mitigate the hand loss from playing Objection.
  5. The Bear's Red Hit

    If the printed Vados reads the same as the website's picture, she should get to check for each attack unlike cards that have once per turn like the pack blue Goku leader who also has dual attack and an attack trigger. Off topic, but when she says to "play it" if you find someone, do you still have to pay energy for it? Looking at the cards there doesn't seem to be a term besides "play" whereas Z at least had "put in play" to differentiate. She's actually pretty bad if you have to pay for who you find.
  6. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    Not only that. If the living card game can be played competitively, you're probably going to need real cards. You know, if you want to be legal about it.
  7. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    Then put one of the good characters on the box. It doesn't matter if a character's playable or not, Vegeta was still featured on boxes of set 1 and Evolution. If you have a license, from a pure marketing standpoint, you gotta make sure those characters are front and center, especially if the license is one as popular as Marvel. I don't mind this mentality when it comes to say... starting a new Yu-Gi-Oh! video game where you have garbage and gradually build a stronger deck as you go. That's where the challenge comes from. The challenge of competitive card games should be winning through skill even if you and everybody's playing the same deck, not going in with a handicap because you don't want to/have access to every card. I don't intentionally build meta decks unless it happens to be a character or theme I like, but you always have a choice. I don't begrudge anyone who plays the meta to win (even if it gets old) but if you claim to enjoy fiddling with unique decks, own all the cards, but build the meta anyway, then it's a matter of self control over self restriction. If you need a card you can afford/justify, get it. Even with unique decks, you should want it to be the best it can be if you can.
  8. Supers per Box

    Are any of the supers staples in any way? Or at least Sphere status where it's not necessarily a staple, but having them can be beneficial? I understand the meta isn't exactly figured out, but I would think that if the supers are already this cheap, how good the cards are aren't a factor when they're so easy to pull. Considering a playset of rares is 36 cards, then yeah. 2 boxes should get you most if not all of those unless you pull too many leaders. I don't know what the sweet spot is here. I know my friends are warming up to the game because it looks so affordable, but if that ever changes, they might get turned off. Meanwhile, stores need to order product carefully.
  9. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    They would also need to be playable out of the box if we're trying to address the "cost of trying it out" issue. However I don't know if that would turn off people who are already into living card games and have to buy an additional product they normally wouldn't have to. I can't imagine a smaller product being purely reprints of cards that already exists just to cater to potential new players.
  10. Why don't Living Card Games get more popular?

    The price tag over time is a little unattractive but that might just be me. While I totally get the appeal of owning every card so you can build any deck at any time, you may be paying more into that than certain card games. PanZ is a relatively cheap game if you only buy the singles you need over boxes. It's fortunate that most decks don't need the Ultras to be competitive. Unleashed is the closest thing and I think that only hit $30 even at its most played. While I'm against $30 cards, if $90 is the bulk cost of your deck, that's not too bad compared to the bigger games especially since Unleashed will carry over to other decks you play. Rares are for the most part worthless and starter MPs as an added cost only appear periodically. Would I prefer to have access to all cards at all times? Absolutely, but with PanZ I didn't have to break the bank unless I wanted to. That's not to say things like Awakening's pull rates and how Spheres were handled weren't disgusting. It's just that objectively, PanZ was relatively cheap despite all the money-grabbing attempts. If we're talking Magic, Yu-Gi-Oh!, and their ilk, then living card games should destroy them. If you buy multiple boxes every set over singles or even if you buy singles for those games, there's no reason you shouldn't be looking at living card games with interest unless those games are bad, the licenses (if any) aren't for you, or there's no competitive scene. It just makes more sense outside of superficial reasons like foils and having the most "bling" at the table. However, unless they start making demo decks or people do research beforehand, I'll echo the idea that ~$10 starter decks trump buying the entire game if you just wanted to try it out. While I was aware that VS came back, I didn't know that's what the box looked like. Where the hell are the characters? Forget advertising the living card game model. Advertise that Spider-Man's in it.
  11. Supers per Box

    I wish there was some concrete consistency in the pull rate but even 6-8 is beyond generous. I'm questioning how much product will sell at this rate unless the good supers are short printed. The premium rares being alt art super rares is very new player friendly, but I don't think too many people will crack boxes just for a shot at them like Spheres. Hopefully this is a business model that'll attract lots of people so for any company who wonders about Super's potential "wild success", it'll change their mind about bad pull rates and their archaic, extortionate business models. What am I saying? No it won't... Let's hope Bandai doesn't take this positive reaction as a means to start adding more and more super rares in following sets like they did with Naruto.
  12. Set 10

    Regarding making Kid Trunks interchangeable with Trunks because we won't see Future Trunks after a while, it's a disappointing possibility but I don't really buy it as a justification. I'd like to think that Nail and Raditz will some day get new levels and if they can out of the blue, so can Trunks. Putting that aside, he's still in Bojack, Super, and has a flashback in Battle of Gods. Even if we don't see him for a while, we know he's coming. With how Future Gohan was handled (which I cannot see the reasoning for), there is no lack of Gohan appearances to the point that we need to sacrifice Future Gohan as an extra MP to support regular Gohan. It makes no sense. Not to mention they straight up fumbled when they made a set including History of Trunks and designed ZERO sword or android cards. Like really, how do you do that?
  13. Set 10

    Unless they call Kid Trunks "Trunks", they'd have to errata Dr Brief as well. There's no reason he shouldn't work with his grandson. You never know. Perhaps Panini always intended for Kid Trunks to be "Trunks" with how they made Dr Brief. They had the foresight to make Chichi work with Goten so I want to believe it was a conscious decision even if I'm disappointed by it. A Videl stack isn't in question. She'll definitely get one but Hercule is featured quite a bit so I think he deserves a single level here to help him out.
  14. Set 10

    Does anyone else want Great Saiyaman to be his own MP and not swappable with Gohan? I'd still let him use Gohan named cards but let him be his alter ego and have another character that can use all six styles. As much as I like Gohan, I don't think he needs help after nonsensically making Future Gohan not his own MP. I'd be more accepting of Saiyaman being interchangeable if Future Gohan wasn't but the idea of Great Saiyaman being his own MP because of his secret identity is fun in its own way. Let's hope they don't do something stupid and make Kid Trunks interchangeable with Trunks... Definitely looking forward to hero 18, a not awful Hercule LV 1, and something for Piccolo. There'd better be some new Android and named cards for old characters... I'm actually pretty disappointed in Spopovich being a MP. I get that there's slim picking for villains, but ugh. I feel like the heritage thing will probably only apply to the colored styles which I'm totally for. Are we finally breaking the stupid barrier of not making new versions of allies that exist? Hoping for a Goku or Vegeta that aren't terrible.
  15. Awakening Cell is broken.

    I think it's still fun to talk about the card game whenever someone has something good to bring up. I'm okay with Trunks. Perhaps I'm not seeing the builds they're talking about or I'm running the right decks/cards to stop him, but I'm assuming it's how fast he gets off 1 and once they hit Evolution 3, they're in a good position for the most part. I think the crux of it is his 2 because it doesn't do anything to further a win condition and it's blank against at least half of the matchups. I generally can't stop his 1 but when they're on 2, they're kind of stuck relying on good draws to get off of it. That kind of says it all. I have numerous problems with the cards and the nonsensical rules, but the game itself will always be fun.
×